CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DPI

USPTO serial 78482427

DPI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DPI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Doyle B. Johnson

DOYLE B JOHNSON REED SMITH LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 2000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3922UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely, network security device having multiple security functions, namely, firewall, virtual private networks, anti-virus, anti-spam, or URL filteringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 18, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance