USPTO serial 78482992
ASCENTIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3067639Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASCENTIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ascential Software Corporation
Westborough, MA
Ascential Software Corporation
Westborough, MA
Ascential Software Corporation
Westborough, MA
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
ARMONK, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino, David J. Kappos, Margaret A. Pepper, Gina M. Lyons
ALEXANDER TOGNINO DAVID J KAPPOS MARG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services related to information technology administration and management | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ascential Software Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ascential Software Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ascential Software Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ASCENTIAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |