Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78483076?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78483076. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns ENERGY GLOW?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78483076, the listed owner(s) include: Chesebrough-Pond's Inc., CONOPCO, INC., CONOPCO, INC..

What is USPTO serial number 78483076?

Serial number 78483076 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark ENERGY GLOW. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover ENERGY GLOW?

The public record lists International Classes: 003. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78483076

ENERGY GLOW

Q: What is the current status of ENERGY GLOW?

ENERGY GLOW (78483076) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Sep 14, 2004
Status date: Sep 14, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: YARD, JOHN S
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGY GLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Chesebrough-Pond's Inc.
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by Chesebrough-Pond's Inc.
CONOPCO, INC.
GREENWICH, CT
Other trademarks owned by CONOPCO, INC.
CONOPCO, INC.
GREENWICH, CT
Other trademarks owned by CONOPCO, INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa W. Rosaya

Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
003	hair care products namely, shampoo, conditioner, mousse, gel and hairspray	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 1, 2009	UNDN	UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN	—
Sep 14, 2009	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2009	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2009	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Jan 7, 2009	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
Jan 7, 2009	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2008	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Jul 14, 2008	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Jul 14, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jan 23, 2008	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Jan 23, 2008	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Jan 23, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2007	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Jul 25, 2007	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Jul 25, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2007	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2006	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 21, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Sep 29, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Sep 28, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Sep 21, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Sep 18, 2006	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Feb 16, 2006	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jul 21, 2005	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 21, 2005	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jun 27, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 13, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 13, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 27, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 15, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 21, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—