USPTO serial 78484730
GOVERNMENT REVENUE MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOVERNMENT REVENUE MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Scott Keller
R. Scott Keller WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD111 Lyon Street, N.W.900 Fifth Third CenterGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in governmental functions, namely property tax recording, valuation, assessment, administration, tax billing and collection, delinquents and tax sales | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 21, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Sep 24, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Sep 24, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 24, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Sep 23, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Oct 27, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Oct 11, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Oct 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Sep 29, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Sep 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |