Drawing for THE CAPE COD JEWELRY COLLECTION

USPTO serial 78485998

THE CAPE COD JEWELRY COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3115449Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 11, 2006
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE CAPE COD JEWELRY COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Salter

Robert Salter Salter & Michaelson321 South Main St.Suite 500Providence, RI 02903

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelrySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 26, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 5, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 5, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance