USPTO serial 78486382
YBOR GOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YBOR GOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles W. Grimes
CHARLES W GRIMES GRIMES & BATTERSBY LLP488 MAIN AVE STE 3NORWALK, CT 06851-1008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Cigars, pipe tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |