USPTO serial 78486899
UTC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UTC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman P. Soloway
Norman P. Soloway HAYES SOLOWAY P.C.3450 E. Sunrise DriveSuite 140Tucson, AZ 85718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepackaged prepared foods, namely, double cooked sliced pork, sweet and sour pork, sauteed shrimp with hot sauce, shredded beef with pepper, Ma-Po's bean curd, soybean, Ma-Po's egg plant, sweet red beans, sweet kidney beans, sweet mixed beans, prepared red beans, prepared black beans, adzuki bean dessert drink, green bean dessert drink, fruit paste, fruit powders for use as food additives, prepared beans, prepared meals consisting primarily of meats, prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables, prepared peanuts, prepared vegetarian meals, soup mixes, prepared fish, meat broth, soup powders, stock, namely vegetable stock, seafood stock, chicken stock and beef stock, seafood broth, prepared meals consisting primarily of seafood, and sweet kidney taros, excluding nuts or fresh or dehydrated fruits or vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Prepared food staples, namely, glutinous fried rice, Cantonese glutinous fried rice covered lotus leaves, glutinous rice dessert containing fruit and nuts, red bean paste, congee, namely a rice gruel or porridge, white bean paste, mung bean paste, bean paste, cakes, cooking seasoning sauces, curry sauces, dessert consisting primarily of rice, prepared meals consisting primarily of rice, tea powders containing milk flavor, prepared tapioca balls, spaghetti sauces, tomato sauces, brown rice and soybean, fruit jellies, salt, cocoa powders, chocolate powders, cookies, puddings, rice and prepared meals consisting primarily of congee, excluding nuts or fresh or dehydrated fruits or vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |