USPTO serial 78487448
OPTIFLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIFLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean C. Henkel
SEAN C. HENKEL SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.16740 HARDY STREETHOUSTON, TX 77032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Downhole well tools, namely circulating subs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |