USPTO serial 78487685
TECHTRONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHTRONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Billie Jean Smith
Billie Jean Smith Michael Best & Friedrich LLP100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, planing machines, polishing machines, drilling machines; electric tools and rechargeable electric tools, namely, circular saws, jigsaws, sanders, reciprocating saws, routers; static woodworking machines and mechanical table tools, namely, table saws, scroll saws, band saws, drill presses, power router tables; portable electric powered tools, namely, circular saws, jig saws, tile saws, trim saws, reciprocating saws, spiral saws, power-operated saws, routers, grinders, burrs, reamers, sanders, buffers, polishers, power operated nailing guns, drills, hammer drills, impact drivers, power staplers, power operated screwdrivers, power caulk guns, power operated lawn and garden string trimmers, power operated grass/weed trimmers, power lawn and garden edgers, power operated cultivators, power operated lawn and garden tillers, power blowers for lawn debris, electric chain saws, power operated pruners, power operated shears, power operated sprayers, vacuum cleaners; drills, namely, drivers, hammer drills, angle drills; grinding machines for cutting; grinders and power cutters; power miter saws; power operated mechanical saws and machine cutting tools for cutting and forming materials; electrical hammers; power operated mechanical drills; electric table drills; power percussion drills; wireless drills; power operated screwdrivers; hand held power operated band grinder; sandpaper grinding machines; cushion cleaning machines; carpet and floor cleaning machines; steam cleaning machines; electric floor buffers; electric vacuum cleaners; rechargeable electric vacuum cleaners; floor scouring machines; food stirring machines, namely, mixers; electric juicer; electric mixers for liquids, namely, blenders; electric mixers; electric kitchen knifes; electric carvers; electric kitchen machines for food production, namely, food processors; power operated wire finders; power operated stud finders; and parts and fittings for all mentioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, hand operated grinders and cutters; hand tools for inserting nails and staples, nailers, staplers; hand tools for gardening, namely, loppers, pruners, shears, shovels, rakes, pruning saws, hoes, hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, weeding forks, cultivators, tillers, mulchers, axes, cutting bars; bits for hand tools, bits sold as parts of hand tools, hand-operated blade sharpening instruments, blades for planes, blades for hand tools, bow saws, hand operated cutting tools, hand operated diggers, hand operated ditchers, hand operated expanders, hammers, hand operated drills, hand operated lawn clippers, machetes, piners, hand-operated plant parasite killing apparatus, namely, sprayer for insecticide, pruning knives, pruning scissors, pruning shears, hand pumps, rakes, sand trap rakes, saw blades for hand tools, handsaws, sword scabbards, shear blades, hand operated shears, shears, shovels, sickles, spades, spanners, spatulas, tool belts, tree pruners, trowels, gardening trowels, weeding forks, hand-operated wire stretchers; planes; screw drivers; sledge hammers; and parts and fittings for all mentioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus for controlling temperature, apparatus for detecting metal pipes and wires in walls; measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, tape measuring devices, namely, measuring tapes, laser measuring systems, wall scanners, metal scanners, electronic laser level instruments for use on walls, floors and surfaces for alignment, electric moisture meters; measuring converters; distance measuring apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Cooling systems, namely, electric space cooling apparatus, evaporative air cooling units, air conditioning apparatus; lighting systems, namely, solar powered lamps; air conditioners; air filters for domestic use; water filters; electrical cooking ovens; electric pressure cookers; microwaves; barbecue grills; electrical slow cookers; lamps; and parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named TECHTRONIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |