USPTO serial 78487725
REBEL GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REBEL GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hollywood, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and accessories, namely skirts, dresses, backpacks, blouses, shirts, button down shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, denim shirts, sweaters, vests, jackets, coats, pants, slacks, denim, shorts, sweatpants, hats, caps, belts, socks, sneakers, shoes, boots, sandals, necktie, blouses, backpacks, purses, jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely a continuing animated or live action show, movie, or play distributed over television, satellite, audio, internet, video media, and on stage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |