USPTO serial 78487772
BIOBASED INSULATION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3220894Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2007
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOBASED INSULATION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FAYETTEVILLE, AR
ROGERS, AR
Rogers, AR
Rogers, AR
FAYETTEVILLE, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trent C. Keisling
Trent C. Keisling Keisling & Pieper PLCP.O. Box 10379Fayetteville, AR 72703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | CHEMICAL FORMULATIONS, NAMELY, BUILDING INSULATION MADE IN WHOLE OR IN PART OF POLYURETHANE, FOAM, SOYBEANS, SOYBEAN OIL, AND OTHER ORGANIC MATERIALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 16, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIOBASED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BIOBASED INSULATION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BIOBASED CHEMICALS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named BIOBASED INSULATION SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |