Drawing for ACCESS TO PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 78488214

ACCESS TO PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCESS TO PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen W. Feingold

Stephen W. Feingold Day Pitney LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-7311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Investment fund transfer and transaction services, namely, acceptance of deposit, including bond issue deposits, and periodical deposits for use in investing; loan financing and discount of bills; financial exchange; security services, namely, guaranteeing loans and assumption of bills; management of portfolios comprising securities, security brokerage; agencies in the field of bonds and other securities, management of portfolios comprising of securities; securities arbitrage services; agencies and brokerage services for trading of securities; security underwriting; mortgaging of securities for others; security underwriting; brokerage of shares and other securities, estate trust management; financial trust operations, trust services, namely, investment and trust company services; consultation services in the field of investment judgment based on analysis of worth of securities; advice relating to investment, commodity investment advice; life insurance brokerage; consultation services in the field of life insurance; insurance agencies in the field of accident insuranceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 13, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance