Drawing for VISION CELLARS

USPTO serial 78489027

VISION CELLARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISION CELLARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison Z. Gifford, Esquire

ALLISON Z GIFFORD ESQ DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVESep 12, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 25, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 25, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 3, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 3, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance