USPTO serial 78489186
J. J. YELEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with J. J. YELEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntersville, NC
Huntersville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl S. Sawyer Jr.
KARL S SAWYER JR KENNEDY COVINGTON LOBDELL & HICKMAN LLP214 N TRYON ST 47TH FLHEARST TWRCHARLOTTE, NC 28202-1078Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal piggy banks; and non-luminous and non-mechanical metal signs | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automobile racing helmets; Computer mouse pads; computer mice; Decorative refrigerator magnets; Computer games, namely, Computer software game programs stored on cartridges and compact disks; refrigerator magnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Baby bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; and Watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Art prints; binders; calendars; lithographs; mounted photographs; notebooks; posters; school supplies, namely, folders, notebooks, three-ring binders, pencils, wire-bound composition books; and unmounted photographs | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Billfolds; Book bags; Duffel bags; Fanny packs; and Tote bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plaques of wood | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Beverage glassware; Clothes pins; Commemorative collector plates; Cups; Drinking steins; Insulated beverage containers; Mugs; Portable Beverage Coolers; and Portable Beverage Steins | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Throw blankets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Golf shirts; Outerwear, namely, Sweatshirts, Fleece shirts, Ponchos, Jackets; Rompers; Shifts; Short sets; Silk clothing ties; Slipper socks; and Ties | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Belt buckles of precious metals for clothing | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Floor Mats for vehicles; Rugs; and Wallpaper | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Action figures; baby rattles; basketballs, Christmas tree ornaments except confectionery or illuminating ornaments; doll clothing; fantasy character toys; fishing lures; fishing rod holsters; footballs; inflatable toys showing decorative pictures; inflatable and non-inflatable ride-on toys; jigsaw puzzles; latex balloons, mechanical and electrical action toys; plush toys, pop-up toys; pull toys; push toys, sand toys; stuffed toys; fishing tackle boxes; wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yeley, J. J.
- Other trademarks owned by Yeley, J. J.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named J. J. YELEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |