Drawing for SPEEDLINE

USPTO serial 78489299

SPEEDLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3rRD AVENUE, 10 FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools in the form of grinding discs, saw blades and grinding platesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 7, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 13, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 19, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 11, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 18, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance