USPTO serial 78489806
KISSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KISSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald J. Weiss
DONALD J WEISS LAW OFFICE OF DONALD J WEISS26 CT STBROOKLYN, NY 11242-0103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING AND CLOTHING ACCESSORIES NAMELY PANTS, SKIRTS AND HANDBAGS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2006 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |