Drawing for NANOPAK

USPTO serial 78490053

NANOPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ajit J. Vaidya

AJIT J VAIDYA HOGAN & HARTSON LLP555 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations used in the treatment of bacterial infectionsACTIVE
044Medical services, namely, treatment of bacterial infectionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Aug 15, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 15, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 27, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 27, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance