USPTO serial 78490129
CODARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3119252Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2006
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CODARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
22880 Wedel, DE
22880 Wedel, DE
22880 Wedel, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin W. Guynn
Kevin W. Guynn Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.300 South Wacker DriveSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Simulators that are processing optical signals, between several, especially, mobile stations, to evaluate signals for weapon aiming, especially ballistic weapons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C.O.E.L. Communikationssysteme + Optronik + Elektronik + Laseranwendungen Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
- Other trademarks owned by C.O.E.L. Communikationssysteme + Optronik + Elektronik + Laseranwendungen Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
- Other trademarks owned by C.O.E.L. Communikationssysteme + Optronik + Elektronik + Laseranwendungen Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CODARTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |