USPTO serial 78490499
Serial No. 78490499
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78490499?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M. BAGARAZZI
JAMES M BAGARAZZI DORITY & MANNING PAPO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Containers for the administering of medication; aerosol atomizers for medicinal purposes; baby bottles; teething rings for easing teeth; feeding bottles; nipples for baby bottles; pacifiers for babies | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Board games; toys, namely, sticking kits made of wood, plastics or metal, namely, an ensemble made of several elements which can be stuck together in order to obtain a three-dimensional model; Toys, namely, box of bricks, building bricks, mobiles; toy cars; play action figures; Electronic education game machines for children; electronic game equipment with a watch function; electronic action skill games; hand-held unit for playing electronic games; kites, costume masks for Mardi Gras; toy figures; dolls; stuffed toy animals; puzzles; Christmas tree ornaments except confectionery or illumination objects; golf bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |