USPTO serial 78490509
NYC TAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NYC TAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip E. Klein
PHILIP E KLEIN KLEIN & LISS LLP470 PARK AVE S 12TH FL SNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Still and sparkling mineral waters, still and sparkling non-mineral drinking waters, non-alcoholic drinks, namely, fruit juices and vegetable juices, fruit and vegetable-based drinks, lemonades, tonic water; concentrates, syrups and powders used in the preparations for making drinks, namely, carbonated, low calorie and non-carbonated soft drinks, fruit drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, fruit juice concentrates, fruit juices, aerated fruit juices, fruit nectars, fruit punch, fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea, vegetable juice and non-alcoholic malt beverage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |