USPTO serial 78490630
NE NORTH END SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NE NORTH END SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 E 6TH ST FL 6CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Sports bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Knit top, t-shirts, sportshirts, tank tops, turtle necks, jackets, fleece jackets, fleece pullovers, jogging suits, pullovers, vests, sweat shirts, sweat tops, sweat pants, sweat bottoms, leggings, shorts, pants, cardigans, sweaters; knit and woven knit and tops, shirts, or sweaters sold as a pair; caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |