USPTO serial 78490756
SACHS RDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3462250Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SACHS RDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
88046 FRIEDRICHSHAFEN, DE
Schweinfurt, DE
Schweinfurt, DE
Schweinfurt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BREWSTER TAYLOR
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 NORTH FAIRFAX STREETSUITE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | SHOCK ABSORBERS FOR MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, CYLINDER TUBES FOR DAMPERS, PISTONS FOR DAMPERS; RUBBER BEARINGS FOR MACHINES AND FOR ENGINES OF MOTOR VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | PARTS OF MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY, WHEEL SUSPENSIONS, AXLES, SUSPENSION STRUTS, VIBRATION DAMPERS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES; SUSPENSION SPRINGS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | SERVICES FOR MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS, NAMELY, CONSULTATION AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF THE DESIGN OF MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZF Sachs AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZF Sachs AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZF Sachs AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SACHS RDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |