Drawing for Serial No. 78491369

USPTO serial 78491369

Serial No. 78491369

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78491369?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristine M. Miller

Kristine M. Miller Holland & Hart LLP555 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3200P.O. Box 8749Denver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning preparations for use in the bath, namely, bath salts, bath milks, and bubble bath; soaps, perfumery, cosmetics, skin sprays for cosmetic purposes, body sprays, men's and women's deodorant sprays, skin lotions, facial lotions, body lotions, hair care products, namely, hair lotions, conditioners and shampoos, hair colors, hair color removers, dentrificesACTIVE—
018Handbags, wallets, traveling bags, luggage, toiletry cases sold emptyACTIVE—
025Women's and children's clothing, headgear, outerwear and accessories, namely, footwear, shirts, tee-shirts, skirts, jeans, sweaters, pants, shorts, socks, underwear, undergarments, jackets, vests, coats, rainwear, hats, caps, visors, cowboy hats, dresses, suits, sport coats, belts, chaps, scarves, gloves, earmuffs, sweatshirts, sweatpantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance