Drawing for INLAND VALLEY WILD

USPTO serial 78491448

INLAND VALLEY WILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INLAND VALLEY WILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, organizing and operating a youth ice hockey clubABANDONEDJun 15, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance