Drawing for E EXPRESS

USPTO serial 78491484

E EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Tognino

Alexander Tognino INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGNORTH CASTLE DRIVEARMONK, NY 10504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE; OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTERS AND SERVERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTING DISPARATE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, SERVERS AND STORAGE DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND PROCESSES THAT EXIST WITHIN AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT; ALL FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR SMALL TO MID-SIZE BUSINESSES NEEDS; AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITHACTIVE—
037TESTING, INSTALLATION, UPDATING, AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWAREACTIVE—
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; ALL FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR SMALL TO MID-SIZE BUSINESSES NEEDSACTIVE—
042TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TESTING, INSTALLATION, UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION; ALL FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR SMALL TO MID-SIZE BUSINESSES NEEDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance