USPTO serial 78491689
KART TRAX FORMULA RACING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KART TRAX FORMULA RACING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Kim
DOUGLAS W KIM MCNAIR LAW FIRM PAPOST OFFICE BOX 10827GREENVILLE, SC 29603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing entertainment services in the field of go-kart racing and arcade amusement games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KART TRAX FORMULA RACING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KART TRAX FORMULA RACING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kart Trax Formula Racing, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named KART TRAX FORMULA RACING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jan 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Jan 10, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Dec 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Dec 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |