USPTO serial 78492022
EXPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3207347Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Rochman, Esq.
Joan Rochman, Esq. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP1841 Page Mill Road, Suite 200Palo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, distribution of audio and video infomercials and programming featuring direct-to-consumer marketing of the products and services of others; providing television advertising for others; dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; advertising services, namely, promoting the products and services of others via the Internet; providing information about the background, differences, and quality of consumer goods and services via television and the Internet; providing retail store services featuring general merchandise in the fields of consumer electronics, computers, autos, beauty, baby gear, medicine, travel, real estate, health and fitness, food, education, telecommunications, and finance, all via television and the Internet and not including home improvement services; licensing services, namely, providing cable, satellite and broadcast television broadcasters a license to show television programs; dissemination of information about the background, differences, and quality of consumer products and services via multiple-user global computer network; retail store services available through computer communications and interactive television, featuring general merchandise in the fields of consumer electronics, computers, autos, beauty, baby gear, medicine, travel, real estate, health and fitness, food, education, telecommunications, and finance and not including home improvement services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 3, 2004 |
| 038 | [ Television broadcasting services; cable television, satellite television, and video on demand transmission and broadcasting services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 3, 2004 |
| 041 | [ Entertainment and educational services, namely, production of television programs of interest to consumers; distribution of television programming to cable television systems; production of cable television programs ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 3, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Expo Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Expo Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Expo Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EXPO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |