USPTO serial 78492060
SOLAVEIL CLARUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALIK, ATTIYA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLAVEIL CLARUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
PATRICK J JENNINGS PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPPO BOX 105001600 TYSONS BLVDMCLEAN, VA 22102-8500Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF COSMETICS, PERFUMES, TOILETRIES AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE ATTENUATION OF ULTRAVIOLET RAYS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF TOILETRIES, SUN PROTECTION TOILETRIES, COSMETICS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 22, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |