CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CBP CERTIFIED

USPTO serial 78492265

CBP CERTIFIED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CBP CERTIFIED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay F. Moldovanyi

Jay F. Moldovanyi FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005All natural health food supplements namely, health supplements from animal and fish sources which are in the form of ground or dry product, in solution or as an extract of animal or fish sourcesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 4, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 4, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 16, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 22, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 8, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 4, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 18, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 14, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance