USPTO serial 78492411
HOTEL TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTEL TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
PETER S SLOANE OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HTI INDUSTRIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HTI INDUSTRIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hotel Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named HOTEL TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |