USPTO serial 78492439
DARING DARLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DARING DARLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven B. Rodner
STEPHEN B RODNER PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances for personal use, colognes and body care products and cosmetics, namely, cosmetic products, namely, facial makeup, concealers, blushers, facial powders, foundation makeup, eye makeup, eye pencils, eyebrow pencils, mascara, false eyelashes, cosmetic compacts, cosmetic pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, lip gloss palatte, lip pomades, lip pencils, eye makeup removers, makeup remover creams, facial cleansers, toners, facial exfoliants, facial scrubs, facial creams, facial moisturizers, facial lotions and non-medicated facial preparations, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, nail care preparations, nail polishes, nail polish removers, nail creams, cuticle removing preparations, nail buffing preparations, hand creams, skin moisturizers, body and hand moisturizing lotions, massage oils, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gels, bath oils, bath powders, bath salts, body cleansers, body fragrances, body and hand lotions, body gels, body powders, body exfoliants, body scrubs, shaving preparations, skin abrasive preparations, body creams, body oils, body masks, body mask powders, body mask lotions, body mask creams, shaving balm, non-medicated lip balm, non-medicated lip care preparations, lip cream, sunscreen preparations, sun block preparations, sunscreen wipe preparations, suntanning preparations, self-tanning preparations, after-sun lotions, perfumes, colognes, toothpaste, deodorant, cosmetic pads, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes, pre-moistened cosmetic tissues and towelettes; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; all purpose cotton swabs for personal use and cosmetic purposes; non-medicated topical skin creams, ointments, gels, toners, lotions, sprays and powders; aromatherapy creams, lotions and oils; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, mousse, gels, frosts, creams, rinses, sprays, hair color, hair waving lotion, permanent wave preparations, hair lighteners, hair dyes, hair emollients, hair mascara, hair pomades, hair color removers, hair relaxers, hair relaxing preparations, hair straightening preparations, hair styling preparations, hair removing cream, and hair care preparations; cosmetic pads; baby wipes; antibacterial pre-moistened cosmetic wipe preparations for use on the skin; cosmetics; disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for personal hygiene and household use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SELECTNY L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Select New York Corporate Communications, LP
- Other trademarks owned by Select New York Corporate Communications, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DARING DARLING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 2, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |