CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for INSPIRED BY TECHNOLOGY. PROVEN BY EXPERIENCE.

USPTO serial 78492525

INSPIRED BY TECHNOLOGY. PROVEN BY EXPERIENCE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3128744Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INSPIRED BY TECHNOLOGY. PROVEN BY EXPERIENCE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph V. Myers III

Joseph V. Myers III SEYFARTH SHAW LLPSUITE 25001075 PEACHTREE STREET, NEATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Affixing and embedding security, authentication, and anti-counterfeiting products for governments and private entitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 25, 2002
045Security, identity authentication, and anti-counterfeiting consulting and services for governments and private entitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 25, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 15, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 27, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 26, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 29, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 27, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance