USPTO serial 78492551
IQ IQ SOLUTIONS BY SOLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IQ IQ SOLUTIONS BY SOLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. Young
Richard W. Young Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP191 N. Wacker DriveSuite 3700Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical goods and apparatus, namely, spectacles, sunglasses, goggles for sports, coated lenses, lens blanks, lens wafers, and ophthalmic lenses of all types, including coated lenses, spectacle lenses, sunglasses lenses and progressive lenses and replacement parts therefore and accessories for all the aforesaid goods; apparatus and instruments for use in the prescription and dispensing of ophthalmic lenses, namely, head and eye tracking systems, digital lens fitting systems, and replacement parts therefore; software for use with apparatus and instruments for use in the prescription and dispensing of ophthalmic lenses, namely, lens selection and recommendation software, lens simulation software, visual behavior diagnostic software; refractometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments, namely, interpupillometers, ophthalmoscopes, ophthalmometers, visual acuity testers, vision testing equipment, refractioning equipment, ophthalmic workstations, ophthalmological diagnostic equipment, ophthalmological diagnostic sets, apparatus and instruments for use in the design and manufacture of ophthalmic lenses; apparatus and instruments for use in the prescription and dispensing of ophthalmic lenses | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of ophthalmic lens prescription and dispensing apparatus and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of ophthalmic lenses to order and/or specification of others; manufacture of ophthalmic lens prescription and dispensing apparatus and equipment to order and/or specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of ophthalmic lenses; design of ophthalmic lens prescription and dispensing apparatus and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Optical services relating to the prescription, dispensing of optical goods, including spectacles and lenses, lens processing technology transfer, dispensing technology selection, lens range selection, marketing; fitting of optical lenses; ophthalmology services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS VISION INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sola International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named IQ IQ SOLUTIONS BY SOLA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |