USPTO serial 78493331
SEAWALKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEAWALKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Helfing
ROBERT F. HELFING SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP801 S FIGUEROA ST.FL 18LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2573Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books, namely reference books, picture books, coloring books, address books and educational books concerning nature, biology and marine life | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bedding, namely sheets, comforters, pillows, comforter covers, duvets and duvet covers; bathroom linens including shower curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely t-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, button-up shirts, pants, shorts, ties, sweaters, underwear, dresses, skirts, blouses, shoes, socks, stockings, hosiery, hats, belts, suspenders, jackets, parkas, jogging suits, jump suits, pajamas, and raincoats | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely games, action skill games, party games, puzzles, toy bake sets, stuffed animals, board games, dolls, figures, figurines, computer danglers and bath toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely a continuing series of live action or animated television programs in the field of action heroes relating to underwater characters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wyland Worldwide, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Wyland Worldwide, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SEAWALKER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |