CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CHEMBIOPRINT

USPTO serial 78494257

CHEMBIOPRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUJA, SANDRA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEMBIOPRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen P. Winner

Ellen P. Winner Greenlee, Winner and Sullivan, P.C.4875 Pearl East CircleSuite 200Boulder, CO 80301

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005all-natural health food supplements, namely, health food supplements from animal and fish sources that are in the form of ground or dry product, in solution, or as an extract of animal or fish sourcesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 17, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 9, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance