USPTO serial 78494455
BALLISTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BALLISTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI, US
Grand Rapids, MI, US
Grand Rapids, MI, US
Michigan Wheel Operations, LLC
Grand Rapids, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry C. Kane
Barry C. Kane KANE & CO., PLC617 Kathryn AvenueSANTA FE, NM 87505UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MARINE PROPELLERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Wheel Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Wheel Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Wheel Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Wheel Operations, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BALLISTIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |