USPTO serial 78495504
VIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP1 DAYTON CENTRE STE 1300 1 S MAIN STDAYTON, OH 45402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | recreational vehicles, namely sport utility trailers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 13, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |