USPTO serial 78495559
AMAZÔNIA VIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMAZÔNIA VIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASFL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and perfumery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |