Drawing for STYLUS

USPTO serial 78496612

STYLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STYLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent E Seton

Kent E. Seton Seton & Associates8730 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400Beverly Hills, CA 90211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Articles of Clothing, namely, Jackets, Coats, Vests, Blazers, Jerseys, Anoraks, Pull-Overs, Track Suits, Pants, Trousers, Slacks, Sweaters, Sweat Shirts, Sweat Pants, T-Shirts, Tank Tops, Shorts, Jeans, Suits, Turtle Necks, Underwear, Briefs, Boxer Briefs, and Boxer Shorts; Wearing Accessories, namely, Kerchiefs and Belts; Headwear, namely, Hats, Caps, Sweat Bands, Sun-Visors, Berets, Bandannas, Hoods, and Head BandsACTIVE—
035Retail store services and wholesale distributorships featuring, apparel, apparel accessories, leather and imitation leather goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2007UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Jun 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 25, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 30, 2006PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Jul 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 13, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance