USPTO serial 78497333
CORNWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORNWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Connors
John J. Connors CONNORS & ASSOCIATES, INC.1600 DOVE STREET #220NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery and utensils, namely, forks, spoons, knives, and sporks, all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer mouse, computer peripherals, computer printers, computer hardware, holders for compact discs, cell phone covers or casing, blank hard computer discs all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Cups for dispensing medicine, feeding cups for medical purposes, medical specimen cups, and specimen cup holders all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Refrigerator shelving, drawers, bins and trays all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Cup holders for vehicles produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Plastic bags for packaging, book holders, coin holders, correspondence holders, desk stands and holders for pens, pencils and ink, paper trays, pen and pencil trays, desktop business card holders, document holders, holders for adhesive tapes, holders for desk accessories, holders for notepads, holders for such sticky tapes, letter holders, paper clip holders, stapler holders, all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Plastic tree protectors and sheeting for agricultural purposes produced using biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, office furniture, computer furniture, plastic boxes, non-metal caps for bottles, non-metal boxes, bottle closures not of metal, and non-metal key holders, using biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Chopsticks, dinnerware, plates, plastic or paper cups and coffee cups, shoe-trees stretchers, toothbrushes, hair brushes and pot cleaning brushes, toothbrush cases, toothbrush holders, toothbrushes electric and non-electric, hair combs, trash cans, bath accessories, namely, cup holders, cardboard cups, coffee cups, beer mugs, cups, dinnerware, namely, plates, cups and saucers, drinking cups not of precious metal, egg cups not of precious metal, mixing cups, plastic cups, sake cups not of precious metal, mane brushes horse combs, empty spray bottles, plastic water bottles sold empty, sake serving bottles tokkuri, sports bottles sold empty, meal trays, drink holders all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other means | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kirsch, Warren J
- Other trademarks owned by Kirsch, Warren J
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CORNWARE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 14, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |