Drawing for CORNWARE

USPTO serial 78497333

CORNWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORNWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery and utensils, namely, forks, spoons, knives, and sporks, all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
009Computer mouse, computer peripherals, computer printers, computer hardware, holders for compact discs, cell phone covers or casing, blank hard computer discs all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
010Cups for dispensing medicine, feeding cups for medical purposes, medical specimen cups, and specimen cup holders all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
011Refrigerator shelving, drawers, bins and trays all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
012Cup holders for vehicles produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
016Plastic bags for packaging, book holders, coin holders, correspondence holders, desk stands and holders for pens, pencils and ink, paper trays, pen and pencil trays, desktop business card holders, document holders, holders for adhesive tapes, holders for desk accessories, holders for notepads, holders for such sticky tapes, letter holders, paper clip holders, stapler holders, all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
017Plastic tree protectors and sheeting for agricultural purposes produced using biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
020Furniture, office furniture, computer furniture, plastic boxes, non-metal caps for bottles, non-metal boxes, bottle closures not of metal, and non-metal key holders, using biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE
021Chopsticks, dinnerware, plates, plastic or paper cups and coffee cups, shoe-trees stretchers, toothbrushes, hair brushes and pot cleaning brushes, toothbrush cases, toothbrush holders, toothbrushes electric and non-electric, hair combs, trash cans, bath accessories, namely, cup holders, cardboard cups, coffee cups, beer mugs, cups, dinnerware, namely, plates, cups and saucers, drinking cups not of precious metal, egg cups not of precious metal, mixing cups, plastic cups, sake cups not of precious metal, mane brushes horse combs, empty spray bottles, plastic water bottles sold empty, sake serving bottles tokkuri, sports bottles sold empty, meal trays, drink holders all produced using hardened biodegradable, corn-based bio-polymer ingredients manufactured by injection molding, extrusion, blowing molding or other meansACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 27, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 10, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
May 10, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 10, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 27, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 7, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 11, 2006REINREINSTATED
Dec 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 14, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance