USPTO serial 78499319
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Corey K. Cho
Corey K. Cho Saliwanchik, Lloyd & Saliwanchik3107 S. W. Williston RoadGAINESVILLE, FL 32608-3925UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, proteins, antibodies, vaccine compositions, antifungals, antitussives, decongestants, cell based products, namely coagulation factors and immune stimulants, and growth factors, namely cytokines, hormones, morphogens and interleukins for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment and prevention of diseases and conditions, namely sinus infections, asthma, sinus inflammation, chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, cancers, lymphomas, Non-Hodgkins lymphoma, B-cell Non-Hodgkins lymphoma, diseases of the immune system, tissue repair and tissue growth applications, allergies, cough, cold, inflammation, fever, nausea and vomiting; and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment and mitigation of pain | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific devices for the development, production and proliferation of cells and proteins, namely bioreactors for automated cell culture and protein production; automated protein purification systems comprising filtration cassettes, filtration membranes, filtration modules, columns, chromatography columns, resin packed columns, ion exchange columns, purification monitors, ultraviolet monitors, photometers, valves, tubing, reservoirs, liquid reservoirs, cell culture media reservoirs and collection vessels; replacement parts for bioreactors and purification systems including filtration cassettes, filtration membranes, filtration modules, columns, chromatography columns, resin packed columns, ion exchange columns, purification monitors, ultraviolet monitors, photometers, gas exchange cartridges, cell culture cartridges, incubation chambers, pumps, culture chambers, valves, tubing, reservoirs, liquid reservoirs, cell culture media reservoirs and collection vessels; and control systems for use with bioreactors and purification systems, namely, microprocessors, process control computers, culture monitors, purification monitors, electronic data recorders, ultraviolet monitors and photometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Drug delivery systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation in the field of pharmaceutical commercialization; distributorship in the field of pharmaceutical product | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Pharmaceutical drug development services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Accentia, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Accentia, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named A
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |