CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PAYPERCLOSE

USPTO serial 78500919

PAYPERCLOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAYPERCLOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Scully

E RUSSELL TARLETON SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing commercial information services via the Internet and other public and private communication media; conducting marketing studies via the Internet, and other public and private communication media; business networking, namely, lead management and distribution; business consultation, business management, business networking and business planning, namely, assisting and advising others in the display of business information, advertising and descriptions of products; management consulting services, namely, advising others in the planning, implementing, operating, managing and staffing of businesses; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a computerized online searchable database of business directory listings and links to the websites of others; lead management and distributionACTIVE—
042design, creation, hosting and maintenance of Internet sites for third parties; business intelligence, namely, data mining services provided via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2005GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance