Drawing for Serial No. 78501635

USPTO serial 78501635

Serial No. 78501635

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78501635?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal B. Wolgin

Neal B. Wolgin Tillman Wright PLLC7400 Carmel Executive Park DriveSuite 120Charlotte, NC 28226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fish oil and other edible fats for use as a food ingredientACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 6, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance