USPTO serial 78502287
TALENTVU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TALENTVU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY J. FEATHERS
TIMOTHY J FEATHERS STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR, 1201 WASTINSON MORRISON HECKER LLPKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL CAMERAS, PC CAMERAS, VIDEO CAMERAS, AND VIDEO PHONES, OPERATING SOFTWARE AND PARTS THEREFOR, ALL FOR USE WITH PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND INTERNET SERVER COMPUTERS, AND SOFTWARE THAT CAPTURES, DIGITALLY COMPRESSES, ORGANIZES, MANIPULATES, STORES, RETRIEVES, REPLAYS RESUMES CONSISTING OF VIDEO, SOUND AND TEXT, AND TRANSMITS THE SAME OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | May 23, 2002 |
| 042 | HOSTING AN ON-LINE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICE FOR THE PURPOSE OF GATHERING, ARCHIVING, ORGANIZING, DIGITALLY COMPRESSING, MANIPULATING, AND TRANSMITTING RESUMES CONSISTING OF VIDEO, AUDIO AND TEXT OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | May 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |