Drawing for NUTRIWISE

USPTO serial 78503497

NUTRIWISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRIWISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy Boldt Cohen

Alan S. Nemes Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP190 Carondelet PlazaSuite 600Saint Louis, MO 63105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Fresh, dry and frozen pastaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 10, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 12, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 30, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 26, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 4, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance