Drawing for KAHTMAYAN

USPTO serial 78503514

KAHTMAYAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAHTMAYAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consultingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2008UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED
May 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 22, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Feb 16, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance