USPTO serial 78504079
SDCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SDCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
PHOENIX, AZ
PHOENIX, AZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing - Hats, shirts, pants, shorts, sweaters, jackets, undergarments | ACTIVE | Oct 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul, Shannon B.
- Other trademarks owned by Meier, Kelli J.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul, Shannon B.
- Other trademarks owned by Meier, Kelli J.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMPLY IN DEMAND, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMPLY IN DEMAND, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SDCS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |