Drawing for IMPERIAL

USPTO serial 78504703

IMPERIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPERIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol Anne Been

CAROL ANNE BEEN SNR DENTON US LLPWACKER DRIVE STATION, WILLIS TOWERP.O. BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Articles of common metal for use in the bathroom, namely, towel hooks, towel rail mounting not of precious metal, and organizational storage binsACTIVE—
020Furniture, namely, furniture made from plastic, bathroom furniture, chairs, stools, tables, cupboards; modular bathroom furniture, cabinets and shelves for storage; non-metal towel rail mountings; fixed towel dispensers not of metal; curtain rails and rods, curtain rings not of metal; medicine cabinets; mirrors; coat hooks not of metal; non-metal, non-glass, non-porcelain and non-earthenware bathroom articles, namely, drawer pulls of plastic, horn, bone, ivory, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum, celluloid, wood, cork, reeds, cane, wicker or synthetic substitutes for these materials; articles of common metal for use in the bathroom, namely, towel racks, towel rods, curtain rails, curtain rods and curtain rings; organizers made of metal and for household use, namely, metal display stands, shelvingACTIVE—
021Bathroom utensils and containers not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, personal hygiene and domestic utensils in the nature of soap holders and dispensers, toilet roll holders and dispensers, toilet paper holders and dispensers, toothbrush organizers and holders, cups, tumblers and tumbler holders, toilet brushes, toilet brush holders and stands, and dustbins for the bathroom; bathroom containers, namely, domestic large and small containers for organizing bathroom shelves and drawers in the storage of bathroom utensils, hygiene items and cosmetics; personal hygiene items, namely, combs, hair brushes, nail brushes, and general washing brushes; bath, facial and cosmetic sponges for applying makeup; comb and nail brush cases sold with combs and nail brushes; bath trays for use in the bathroom and trays for holding bathroom utensils, all not permanently attached to a tub or shower; and any aforesaid goods made of glass, porcelain, and earthenware; articles of common metal for use in the bathroom, namely, towel rails, towel rings, towel rods, tumblers and tumbler holders, toilet brush holders and stands, bath trays for domestic use in the bathroom for holding bathroom utensils and not permanently attached to a tub or shower, dustbins, soap holders and dispensers, toilet roll holders and dispensers, toilet paper holders and dispensers, toothbrush organizers and holders; trays made of metal and for domestic purposes, utensils and organizers made of non-precious metal and for household use, namely, containers for household useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 6, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 29, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008ZZAXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU—
Oct 17, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 24, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 10, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance