Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78505024?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78505024. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns TRIPLE PLAY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78505024, the listed owner(s) include: SCHWARTZ, RICHARD.

What is USPTO serial number 78505024?

Serial number 78505024 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark TRIPLE PLAY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover TRIPLE PLAY?

The public record lists International Classes: 018. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78505024

TRIPLE PLAY

Q: What is the current status of TRIPLE PLAY?

TRIPLE PLAY (78505024) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Oct 25, 2004
Status date: Oct 16, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIPLE PLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

SCHWARTZ, RICHARD
ROSLYN, NY
Other trademarks owned by SCHWARTZ, RICHARD

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH H. RICHMAN, ESQ

KEITH H RICHMAN ESQ RICHMAN & LEVINE PC666 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 101GARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
018	ROLLING DUFFLES, LUGGAGE, SPORT BAGS, BACKPACKS, TOILETRY KITS SOLD EMPTY, BEACH BAGS, TOTE BAGS	ACTIVE	Jul 16, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 16, 2006	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Oct 16, 2006	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Sep 26, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 24, 2006	LOAP	LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED	—
Jul 24, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 23, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 23, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 14, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 14, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Nov 14, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 1, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—