USPTO serial 78505251
DVD EMPIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DVD EMPIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy E. Leonard, Esquire
ROY E. LEONARD, ESQUIRE STONECIPHER, CUNNINGHAM, BEARD & SCHMITT125 FIRST AVENUEPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |